n8n vs activepieces
A comprehensive comparison to help you choose the right AI tool in 2026.
Our Pick
n8n
n8n scores higher with a rating of 8.5/10
Feature Comparison
| Feature | n8n | activepieces |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 8.5/10 | 7.8/10 |
| Pricing Model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting Price | $20/mo | Free |
| Free Trial | Yes | Yes |
| Founded | 2019 | 2022 |
n8n
Open-source workflow automation tool with a visual editor and self-hosting option.
Pros
- + Free self-hosted option
- + Open-source with active community
- + 400+ integrations
- + Custom JavaScript/Python nodes
- + No per-task pricing on self-hosted
Cons
- - Steeper learning curve than Zapier
- - Self-hosting requires DevOps knowledge
- - Cloud plan can get expensive at scale
activepieces
Open-source no-code business automation platform built for teams.
Pros
- + Completely free self-hosted version
- + Clean and intuitive UI
- + Active open-source community
- + TypeScript SDK for custom pieces
- + Generous free cloud tier
Cons
- - Smaller integration library than Zapier
- - Newer platform with less documentation
- - Enterprise features still maturing
n8n vs activepieces: The Bottom Line
Both n8n and activepieces are powerful AI tools, but they serve slightly different needs. n8n excels at free self-hosted option, while activepieces stands out for completely free self-hosted version.
Your choice should depend on your specific requirements, budget, and the features that matter most to your workflow.