n8n vs Make
A comprehensive comparison to help you choose the right AI tool in 2026.
Our Pick
n8n
n8n scores higher with a rating of 8.5/10
Feature Comparison
| Feature | n8n | Make |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 8.5/10 | 8.4/10 |
| Pricing Model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting Price | $20/mo | $10.59/mo |
| Free Trial | Yes | Yes |
| Founded | 2019 | 2016 |
n8n
Open-source workflow automation tool with a visual editor and self-hosting option.
Pros
- + Free self-hosted option
- + Open-source with active community
- + 400+ integrations
- + Custom JavaScript/Python nodes
- + No per-task pricing on self-hosted
Cons
- - Steeper learning curve than Zapier
- - Self-hosting requires DevOps knowledge
- - Cloud plan can get expensive at scale
Make
Visual automation platform for complex workflows. More powerful and affordable alternative to Zapier for advanced users.
Pros
- + Much cheaper than Zapier
- + Visual workflow builder
- + Advanced branching and logic
- + Better error handling
- + 1,000+ integrations
Cons
- - Steeper learning curve
- - Fewer integrations than Zapier
- - Documentation could be better
- - Can be overwhelming for beginners
n8n vs Make: The Bottom Line
Both n8n and Make are powerful AI tools, but they serve slightly different needs. n8n excels at free self-hosted option, while Make stands out for much cheaper than zapier.
Your choice should depend on your specific requirements, budget, and the features that matter most to your workflow.