Sourcegraph Cody vs Continue.dev
A comprehensive comparison to help you choose the right AI tool in 2026.
Our Pick
Sourcegraph Cody
Sourcegraph Cody scores higher with a rating of 8.1/10
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Sourcegraph Cody | Continue.dev |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 8.1/10 | 8/10 |
| Pricing Model | freemium | free |
| Starting Price | $9/mo | Free |
| Free Trial | Yes | Yes |
| Founded | 2023 | 2023 |
Sourcegraph Cody
AI coding assistant with deep codebase context, using your entire repository to provide highly accurate suggestions.
Pros
- + Uses entire codebase for context
- + Supports multiple LLM backends
- + Enterprise-grade security
- + Powerful code search
Cons
- - More complex setup than competitors
- - Best features require Pro plan
- - Heavier resource usage
Continue.dev
Open-source AI code assistant that allows you to connect any LLM to your VS Code or JetBrains IDE.
Pros
- + Fully open source and free
- + Connect any LLM including local models
- + Highly customizable
- + Active development community
Cons
- - Requires LLM API configuration
- - Less polished than commercial tools
- - Documentation can be lacking
Sourcegraph Cody vs Continue.dev: The Bottom Line
Both Sourcegraph Cody and Continue.dev are powerful AI tools, but they serve slightly different needs. Sourcegraph Cody excels at uses entire codebase for context, while Continue.dev stands out for fully open source and free.
Your choice should depend on your specific requirements, budget, and the features that matter most to your workflow.